There has been much discussion within
medicine as to the health risks faced by women who give birth after the age of
35. Birth defects and difficulty getting pregnant have served as the
reasons for this popular discussion amongst physicians. I’ve even been
told that the older you are, the older your eggs are and that this makes your
eggs less viable.
In an article entitled, “Myth: Pregnant
Mothers Over 35 Have Higher Risk of Giving Birth to Down Syndrome Babies”
(Health Myth Exposed, 2008), it states that Down Syndrome is a chromosomal
disorder and that most children born with Down Syndrome are born of women under
the age of 30. It goes on to say that women who desire to have children
after 35 should eat healthy and add folic acid to their diet long before they
become pregnant. The lack of folic acid in pregnant women has recently
been linked to Down Syndrome, NOT OUR AGE.
I am a 40 year old mother of six. Yes,
six, two of which were born after I turned 35 and one just a month prior to my
35th birthday.
When I began my prenatal checkups, I
received the typical lecture about the risks and I was offered the diagnostic
testing for this defect or that defect. I refused to have any
amniocentesis’ along with many other tests. I took the attitude of that
my lifestyle is clean; I don’t drink, smoke, and I eat properly (most of the
time –smile).
I figured that giving birth is the
oldest profession in the world. Long before there were “doctors”,
children have been born happy and healthy. God blessed me with these
pregnancies and I wasn’t going to allow anyone to make me feel bad or worry
unduly over my pregnancies.
My son, who was the child born one
month before I turned 35, was born with a type of dwarfism called
Achondroplasia. This is considered a birth defect by the medical world,
however, I take issue with this based on my age as well as I connect the dots
with research on Achondroplasia.
Now, this had nothing to do with my
age, nor the age of my husband. He was 33 years old and according to
medical studies on Achondroplasia, it appears with the upward age of the
father. Medical research has also concluded that the mutated gene, which
causes it is predominantly found within families where the gene is already
present. Yet 80 percent of all who have it are the first in their family
with it. I site the information to show and prove that while the medical
field is an invaluable tool, it also has flaws based on missing facts and
bottom line political agendas.
If I were born in the 30’s or 40’s, my
child would have been locked away from the world and labeled a social
embarrassment. There comes a time when we must take charge of our lies and
realize that we live in our own bodies and know them better than any doctor.
I am blessed to report that my son shows no health issues usually associated
with his condition. He is an intelligent and action five year old.
WebMD News ran an article on July 16,
2004 entitled, “Giving Birth After 35 Cuts Cancer Risks”. The writer,
Daniel Denoon, deals with the risk of ovarian cancer and how women who give
birth to at least one child after 35 cut their risk of developing ovarian
cancer down by half. He goes on to note that each additional birth after
this time cuts the risk by ten percent.
The two children born to me after 35
are healthy and are not suffering from any residual effects of being born to a
so-called older mother. I breastfed all six of my children and had an
ample supply of milk from the eldest child to the youngest. My youngest
was born 13 days after I turned 40 and she was eight pounds and three ounces.
Whether as women we intentionally plan
to birth children after 35 or it is a surprise event, I believe that it should
be treated as though it is a blessing from God, because it is. We should
make it a practice to exercise, get proper rest, eat healthy,
and above all maintain a proper relationship with God.
May Allah (God) bless you with the
light of understanding as these words were giving in love!
Sister DiLarus Muhammad
No comments:
Post a Comment